The same fictional patient enters an illustrative review queue. A high IPSS score represents symptom burden, not emergency triage or a diagnosis.
Synthetic sample queue · select Alex to follow the case
No real patient is on this list.
Real geographic basemap for demonstration only. No patient locations or demand measurements are plotted.
Guide completion = 18 ÷ 28. Care review conversion = 7 ÷ 28 = 25.0%. Illustrative 30-day sample.
Illustrative cohort: 100 starts over a sample 30-day period. Counts are synthetic, not live patient analytics.
Next-stage unique visitors ÷ previous-stage unique visitors. The 100 → 82 → 64 → 49 → 27 funnel uses a separate synthetic enterprise cohort, not the private-practice sample.
Education: 18/100 (18%); IPSS: 18/82 (22.0%); Guide: 15/64 (23.4%); Care request: 22/49 (44.9%).
Median elapsed days from first care-review request to completed clinical consultation, among patients with both events. Pending requests are reported separately.
Median elapsed days from first care-review request to completed treatment, among treated patients; display pending and untreated cohorts separately to avoid overstating speed.
Track requested, pending, approved, denied, appealed, and not-required statuses with timestamps. Approval does not equal clinical clearance.
Aggregate by pathway, service line, location, language, referral source and stage; small groups should be suppressed to protect privacy.
Guide prepared → care review requested. Denominator is users reaching the prior stage.
Illustrative median from review request to first completed consultation.
Illustrative median from review request to treatment, among treated cases.
Illustrative workflow statuses. Clearance is not a guarantee of treatment.
The patient record has been opened from Demand Intelligence. This is a hypothetical match, not a live referral or clinical approval.
In this fictional scenario, Alex undergoes clinical evaluation, reviews treatment options, and elects prostate artery embolization (PAE).
Coordinator review has not started.
Illustrative workflow checklist. These are review items, not universal clinical requirements.
Selections do not order imaging, certify readiness, or enter an EHR.
No information is sent to Epic or Miami Medical.
PAE may be an option for selected patients with symptomatic BPH following evaluation. Alternatives include observation, medications, other minimally invasive procedures and surgery.
Booking and procedure completion are visual simulations only. No scheduling, orders or medical records are created.
The same fictional patient appears in a follow-up workspace. A postprocedure guide, patient-reported outcomes and clinician-directed follow-up are shown as proposed workflows.
After prostate artery embolization, mild pelvic discomfort, urinary frequency, fatigue or temporary irritative symptoms may occur. Follow the instructions of your treating team.
Some teams prescribe analgesics, anti-inflammatory drugs or other medicines based on individual circumstances. No universal medication regimen is implied.
Routine CT is not automatically required after PAE. Imaging and follow-up are determined by clinical findings and local protocols.
Promptly report fever, inability to urinate, worsening severe pain, significant bleeding or other concerning symptoms. For emergencies, seek emergency care.
Baseline IPSS: 23/35
Illustrative 3-month IPSS: 9/35
This example shows a follow-up survey, not an actual patient assessment. Choose a response to preview how outcomes might be captured.
No data is stored, transmitted or associated with a real patient.
From the first question to coordinated care and follow-up, One Door brings the patient journey and actionable demand intelligence together.
For practices, health systems, and partners. This demonstration uses a fictional institution and synthetic patient activity; it is not a patient-care service.